Most Popular Sports
All Sports
Show All

Paula Radcliffe, Jonathan Edwards under threat – is it time to reset world records?

Ben Snowball

Updated 02/05/2017 at 15:11 GMT

Paula Radcliffe and Jonathan Edwards have slammed a radical pitch to wipe their world records – but is their opposition justified?

Paula Radcliffe, Jonathan Edwards

Image credit: Eurosport

Under new proposals suggested by a European Athletics taskforce, world and European records achieved pre-2005 would be rewritten in the IAAF books. Somewhat conveniently, Usain Bolt – track and field’s leading light – is unaffected.
It means GB stars Radcliffe and Edwards, women's marathon and men's triple jump world record holders respectively, are in danger of seeing their marks chalked off.
Taskforce chair Pierce O'Callaghan admitted that innocent athletes would be "collateral damage", but said it was a necessary evil in the journey to restoring athletics’ credibility.
picture

Paula Radcliffe, EPO, doping

Image credit: Reuters

"Apologies to the athletes, we never intended to damage their reputation and legacy," O'Callaghan told BBC Radio 5 live.
"It [the proposal] is intended to give the public belief and credibility in what they are watching in the sport."
Both Radcliffe and Edwards branded the move "cowardly". Edwards told the Guardian:
I thought my record would go some day, just not to a bunch of sports. It seems incredibly wrong-headed and cowardly. And I don't think it achieves what they want it to. Instead it cast doubts on generations of athletics performances.
The IAAF has only stored blood and urine samples since 2005. Other world records under threat would include Mike Powell's long jump mark in 1991 and Hicham El Guerrouj's 1500m in 1998.
picture

Hicham El Guerrouj, WR

Image credit: Getty Images

"We hope people look at it in that vein, rather than stripping great athletes like Paula of their records," O'Callaghan added.
"Unfortunately, Paula ran her records in a golden period that happens to be two years before the technology moved on.
"People should not look at Paula's records and throw them in with doping records - she achieved her performance, as did Jonathan, with 100 per cent integrity."

THE NEW CRITERIA

The report proposes that world and European records should only be recognised if the performance is achieved at an approved event where high standards of officiating and technical equipment can be guaranteed.
It also calls for an agreed number of doping control tests in the months before the performance and the doping sample after the record to be stored and made available for re-testing for 10 years.
IAAF president Sebastian Coe said on Monday:
I like this because it underlines that we [athletics governing bodies] have put into place doping control systems and technology that are more robust and safer than 15 or even 10 years ago. There will be athletes, current record holders, who will feel that the history we are recalibrating will take something away from them but I think this is a step in the right direction and if organised and structured properly we have a good chance of winning back credibility in this area.

WHAT RECORDS ARE UNDER THREAT?

Men
EventAthleteYearRecord
1500mHicham El Guerrouj1998 3:26.00
5000mKenenisa Bekele2004 12:37.35
3000m steeplechaseSaif Saaeed Shaheen2004 7:53.63
400m hurdlesKevin Young1992 46.78s
High jumpJavier Sotomayor19932.45m
Long jumpMike Powell1991 8.95m
Triple jumpJonathan Edwards1995 18.29m
ShotRandy Barnes1990 23.12m
DiscusJurgen Schult1986 74.08m
HammerYuriy Sedykh1986 86.74m
JavelinJan Zelezny1996 98.48m
picture

Mike Powell, 1991

Image credit: Imago

Women
EventAthleteYearRecord
100mFlorence Griffith Joyner1988 10.49s
200mFlorence Griffith Joyner1988 21.34s
400mMarita Koch1985 47.60s
800mJarmila Kratochvílova1983 1:53.28
MarathonPaul Radcliffe2003 2:15:25
400m hurdlesYuliya Pechonkina2003 52.34m
High jumpStefka Kostadinova1987 2.09m
Long jumpGalina Chistyakova19887.52m
Triple jumpInessa Kravets1995 15.50m
Shot Natalya Lisovskaya1987 22.63m
DiscusGabriele Reinsch1988 76.80m
HeptathlonJackie Joyner-Kersee1988 7291 pts
picture

Florence Griffith Joyner, 1988 Olympics

Image credit: Getty Images

THE PROS

Like it or not, the shadow of doping is cast over athletics. Rio marathon champion Jemima Sumgong became the latest athlete to fail a drug test for EPO, with credibility and trust continuing to sink to new depths. Rather than lauding new performances, breakout success is treated with a shrug of the shoulders – and that’s a direct consequence of a stream of doping stories.
Eliminating the old records would help gain recognition for athletes, particularly female sprinters and throwers, who are potentially chasing impossible standards. There’s a hefty reward for breaking world records, whether it’s prize money or sponsorship deals, and there are some events with a laughable amount of suspicion.
picture

Jemima Sumgong (KEN) of Kenya celebrates after winning the race

Image credit: Reuters

THE CONS

We’re not suddenly living in a golden age of clean athletics. Just because you freeze doping samples, it doesn’t mean you’ll catch all the cheats – although, obviously, it’s a great stride forward. The state-sponsored doping revelations around Russia, and the apathy/inability of Kenya towards tackling their current crisis, shows how far athletics is from declaring a clean sport. Hastily wiping the records will only lead to embarrassment in the future – even with the new criteria.
Also, what’s the point? As the current world records are yet to be disproved, people are still going to compare any future marks to the previous ensemble. It’s not like they’re going to vanish from memory.
And anyway, there’s another solution: ban cheats for life. It's really that simple. While the threat of having a world record unratified might not scare a potential doper, a no nonsense policy that removes all cheats immediately might just make them think twice.
With additional reporting from Reuters
Join 3M+ users on app
Stay up to date with the latest news, results and live sports
Download
Related Topics
Share this article
Advertisement
Advertisement