Most Popular Sports
All Sports
Show All

Football news - VAR + handball = death of football

Ben Snowball

Updated 07/03/2019 at 19:27 GMT

What a farce.

VAR drama

Image credit: Getty Images

Sure, only a team of immense bottling quality would allow themselves to be in a position like this again. When you’re outdone by a midfield containing Scott McTominay and Andreas Pereira, having spent over £400m in two seasons, it’s probably time for your Champions League adventure to end. Sorry, PSG.
But in those circumstances?
Let’s get one thing clear: it was never, ever a penalty. And, for the avoidance of doubt, here's why:
  • Put your laptop/smartphone down for a moment. Find a quiet spot outside. Now sprint five metres and jump. What happened to your arms?
  • Now watch Diogo Dalot's shot in real time. Are the Manchester United players appealing? Is there a cry of ‘handball’ from the away end as the ball hits Presnel Kimpembe – a plea that meets the remotest sniff of a penalty?
Slow-motion once made the beautiful game more beautiful; bringing flicks and tricks to the masses, allowing fans to savour a shot rippling into the top corner. But now? Its primary purpose is to destroy football – every tackle appearing worthy of a straight red, every handball blatant.
Here’s what happened: Kimpembe charged out to block a shot, turning as he jumped. The ball struck his hand, in a perfectly natural position for balance, from close-range. It was all over in 0.1 seconds.
Here’s what VAR wanted us to see: Kimpembe charged out to block a shot, turning as he jumped AND sticking his arm out deliberately... *slows footage down*... 'Look how much time he had to move his arm.'
It’s not the first time VAR has needlessly intervened on a huge stage. It’s rarely recalled, largely due to the brilliance of Kylian Mbappe (awkwardly missing on Wednesday evening), but Ivan Perisic was found guilty of a similar offence in the 2018 World Cup final as Croatia succumbed to France.
The main issue? VAR is being applied incorrectly. From the official handout:
The referee’s decision can ONLY BE CHANGED if the video review shows a CLEAR ERROR i.e. not ‘was the decision correct?’ but: ‘was the decision clearly wrong?’
picture

The Manchester United celebrate team with the travelling fans at the final whistle during the UEFA Champions League Round of 16 Second Leg match between Paris Saint-Germain and Manchester United at Parc des Princes

Image credit: Getty Images

How was Damir Skomina's decision to award a corner a clear error? VAR’s role isn't to offer a subjective opinion, it's to correct those decisions which are so horrible they can be overturned in 20 seconds and the flow of football resume.
Surely the rules for VAR and handball working in unison need a retune:
  • Use slow-motion to check if the ball hits the arm BUT make decision based on real-time footage
  • Accept that footballers have arms that move when they move
  • Ask the question: ‘could the defender have got their arm out of the way in time?’
Don’t just slow down the footage until you convince yourself it’s a penalty. That’s not how football should work.
Of course, you may (somehow) think it’s a handball – mainly those who subscribe to Gary Lineker’s proposed manifesto ‘if it hits the arm, it’s a foul’, but that would change football, and not for the better.
Why bother opening up a defence when you could take a speculative shot and hope it flicks an arm? Why bother dribbling past an opponent when you could just try and whack the ball against their hand?
A dystopian future is on the horizon. Where defenders have to dodge shots; where fans get VAR printed on the back of shirts; where 20 minutes of added-on time becomes the norm. The beautiful game... no longer beautiful.
Join 3M+ users on app
Stay up to date with the latest news, results and live sports
Download
Share this article
Advertisement
Advertisement